Wednesday, May 1, 2013

Film & Sustainability Series: The Hunger Games


the-hunger-gamesLast spring The Hunger Games set off a new wave of fantasy movie buzz with it's tidal wave of popularity and financial success. The second film installment, Catching Fire, is sure to be even bigger when it premiers Nov. 22, 1013.

This post will look at the film The Hunger Games as well as the book trilogy which birthed the movie series. So, be warned, mild spoilers lie ahead.
To start, I love the series' social commentary on starvation, poverty, and oppression. Though other films and books have tried to discuss the same issues, not many have found that incredible balance of subtle-but-powerful that Suzanne Collins created. The Humer Games' fictional pseudo-kingdom of Panem, a dystopian North America that doesn't shy away from violence, mirrors problems of the real world in an accessible way only fantasy can project.
Due to the Panem government's strict regulations and oppressing nature, the protagonist Katniss Everdeen's world looks bleak from the outset. The people of her home, District 12, are desperately lacking the most basic resources. Katniss must break the law and risk torture - or worse - to enter a forest in search of food nearly every day. She must choose between constant danger and starvation. This lack of food is highlighted in one of the film's most poignant scenes; right before Katniss is ripped away from her home to join the Hunger Games, her parting line is an order to her friend: "Whatever you do, don't let them starve."

Right after she leaves District 12, Katniss' train to the Capitol contains many lingering shots of a rich buffet in the dining car. The film, as well as the book, juxtaposes District 12's pervasive hunger with abundant food imagery in wealthier locations. This theme fills the entire trilogy, from flashbacks of Katniss' family drinking mint tea to fill their empty stomachs to a Capitol party where the fashion is to publicly purge and go back for another stomach-full of food.

From these scenes, the Capitol strikingly resembles America's perchance for over-consumption while many areas of the world live in perpetual hunger. The site Mindfully gives some eye-opening statistics about our consumption in relation to other countries; the U.S. tosses 200,000 tons of edible food daily, and eats extra, unneeded food that would feed 80 million people.

The Hunger Games draws much of its content from such realities, including Katniss' reaction to the Capitol. Though Katniss is momentarily dazzled by the new world of food she has entered, she can't look at it without thinking of the thin, gaunt faces she knows back home. Never is there a big meal or a banquet celebration without her thinking back to District 12's lack of sustenance. This juxtaposition of starvation and decadence shows two economic extremes that our world also faces. In Katniss' world and our own, the poverty gap is a real concern.

Wealth vs. poverty is another social commentary theme Collins draws from. While this socioeconomic gap becomes prominently gross as the series progresses, the first installment suavely introduces it with the hunger game lottery rules. The citizens desperate for food enter their names extra times for essential staples. The poorer the family, the more times the child enters themself.  One review calls such children "economic conscripts. As one New York Times article puts it, for people like Katniss, this practice is essentially "a death sentence — no one from the underfinanced and under­nourished District 12 has won in decades." These conscripts must face against their wealthier counterparts, who are trained from birth for the hunger games and have significantly higher odds of winning.


The is certainly more connections to be made here. Katniss fits the bill for a sustainable heroine: she's happiest when she hunts and forages, preferring untouched forests to overcrowded cities. And Katniss never lets things go to waste if she can help it [much like another hero in a previous post].

Though I've only scratched the surface of all that lies bubbling beneath The Hunger Games' popular draw [note: war, reality television, Jennifer Lawrence's incredibly complex performance, the seemingly-inevitable-love-triangle], I am excited to see how this story will play out further on the big screen.

Careers in Sustainability for New Graduates


1129671-ten-best-green-jobs-for-the-next-decade-article1
Green Jobs are filling the job market like never before.
In Response, SPU alumna Amity Lumper shared how her green efforts at SPU turned into a career in sustainability. And she is just one of many who has turned an environmental interest into a livelihood.
According to a report by the United Nations Environment Programme, "new jobs are beginning to emerge in favor of greener, cleaner and more sustainable occupations." 

The same report defines "Green Jobs" as "work in agriculture, manufacturing, research and development, administrative, and service activities that contribute substantially to preserving or restoring environmental quality." The report also carefully states that these jobs must support the livelihood of the employees with fair compensation and benefits. And green jobs are involved in various activities like advocacy, education, outreach, or technology. This means that nearly every major can prepare one for a sustainable vocation.

Want a green-collar job after graduation? Here are some potential careers:
  • Organic Farming, privately or at organizations like
  • Energy Analyst or Specialist
  • Sustainability Coordinator or Adviser
  • Nonprofit DirectorGreenJobsKeyboard
  • Public Health Specialist
  • Environmental Technician
  • Conservation Biologist
  • Environmental Consultant
  • Environmental Lawyer
  • Ecology Educator
  • Alternative Energy Engineer
  • Green Accounting
  • Construction
  • Interface Designer
  • Energy Efficiency Builder or Architect
  • Urban or Land Use Planner
  • Carpenters
Here are more resources for searching green jobs:

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Biking In Seattle


OK, I can't be the SPU student to watch this skit of Portlandia and immediate think of my own neighborhood. And I can't be the only one who has been nearly run off the road by the Seattle bikers, especially around the Fremont Bridge and the Ballard Bridge (the latter of which where I had my arm sharply bruised by a bicycle handle last spring).

Though I commend Seattle's efforts to make the city more bike-friendly, I also worry about some of the unintended consequences. More bicyclists mean more congested trails and bike lanes, which is breeds bicycle road rage. I have often seen bicyclists around SPU react rudely to cars and pedestrians alike. While I support their efforts to reduce vehicle emissions by leaving the car at home, getting constantly yelled at by these bikes infuriates me.

This seems to be a growing concern with the residents and the city of Seattle. The Seattle Bike Blog has posted more than one column advising bicyclists on how to manage their anger on the road.

Of course, many cyclists say that their behavior is a defensive tactic to keep themselves safe from cars, which is another problem facing the Seattle streets.

My main problem with this issue is that aggressive people on the road -- regardless of their mode of transportation -- make me want to avoid the more vulnerable modes of walking and biking. And it is such a shame that I can't fully enjoy my city because of a few jerks.

To make the roads safer for everyone, we really only need to follow some simple etiquette rules for cyclists and pedestrians:
  • Always pass on the left, using bells and voices to alert those in front of you
  • Walkers and slow-moving bikes stay to the right and allow others to pass
  • Be alert and aware of others around you
  • Travel at a safe speed, slowing down to meet the conditions of the road/trail
  • Mutual respect for those on the road
Riding defensively is one thing, but entitled riding is another.
What are some solutions you have for making pathways and streets safer for SPU students?

How to Grow Your Own Garden


Want to save money, improve your health, and spend more time outdoors? Start your own garden! Growing your own fruits and vegetables is the ideal way to control what chemicals come into contact with your produce, and more affordable than the grocery store. Even better, homegrown food is often tastier and healthier than its store-bought counterpart.

Since it is likely that we have passed the last Seattle frost, you can start planting new crops right away. Even if your housing doesn't offer a lot of space, you can grow gardens in a sunny corner of your backyard, in your nearby P-Patch, or even in the SPU organic community garden located off of 4th Ave and W. Dravus St.

Luckily, growing your own plants is easier than most people think.

You can begin growing plants in indoor pots if the weather is still too cold or wet for the fragile baby plants, and replant them in tilled soil once the sun starts shining more. Or start a windowsill garden with small pots of culinary herbs like rosemary and oregano.

Although starter plants have the highest likelihood of living until they bear edibles, they can get a bit expensive depending on your plant of choice. Prices can vary from $3 - $30 and higher. A packet of seeds, on the other hand, only costs about a dollar, and has the ability to grow multiple starts. The cheapest growers are hardy vegetables like tomatoes, peppers, broccoli, and squash.

But the cheapest and easiest option for growing food is to cut off the growing “eyes” of old potatoes and planting them in the nearest patch of dirt. Potatoes are very low-maintenance to grow, needing only partial sunlight and moist soil. Dig them up in 2-4 months to find a bunch of tender, new potatoes perfect for roasting or frying.

And if you compost, the free mulch from your yard clippings and leftovers is the best nutrition for growing plants (and if you don’t compost, start now!).

Space_312
The SPU community garden
Have questions or concerns about starting up your own garden? Comment down below and we will answer any you throw our way.

Portlandia & the Culture of Sustainability



Feminist book stores, indie street music, über-aggressive bicyclists. That’s right: Portlandia is coming.

Well, actually the sitcom has already arrived, having just finished its third season. But you get the point.

The offbeat but tangible skits in Portlandia depict fictional over-the-top citizens of Portland as they engage in controversial social and ecological topics. Underneath the humorous satire, however,  Portlandia engages with serious controversies and debates in today’s society. And many of these issues resonate within SPU’s own area.

Winner of the 2013 Writers’ Guild award for Outstanding Achievement in Writing Comedy/Variety Series, Portlandia has slowly but surely seeped into the consciousness of the Pacific Northwest, and the way everyone perceives the area – including its own inhabitants.

Though the mayor of Portlandia staunchly supports Portland’s independence from Seattle, many have noticed uncanny similarities between the two cities. Many Seattleites I've talked to said that they see aspects of their own behavior in Portlandia’s characters, whether it is "rescuing" items from dumpsters or going overboard with pet rights or owning multiple items with bird silhouettes. But many in Seattle – including yours truly – also recognize themselves in Portlandia's sustainability spoofs.

With Seattle following the trend of going “green,” our own city is taking steps similar to Portland to become more eco-friendly. In fact, Seattle has a strong history of following the sustainability policies of Portland over the past decade. Following Portland’s lead, Seattle has worked to encourage commuter bicycling, sidewalk cafés, and plastic bag bans. And while all of these actions are great for the environment, they have garnered a lot of controversy.

Portlandia capitalizes on the ongoing debates by playfully mocking many of these topics, such as the two-minute skit about reusable grocery bags below.

However, I can't help but feel that Portlandia misses some crucial issues.

While Portlandia's skit humorously demonstrates the social aspects of the bag issue, it ignores the environmental side. The rude clerk never explains to the customer why forgetting his bag is such a ghastly crime, or anything even remotely close to how reusable bags conserve resources. He just embarrasses the poor man as if he had broken a social taboo. And in another skit, the only reason they can give for banning plastic bags is the ridiculous claim that plastic causes “pelican cancer.”

However, perhaps this approach is intended to make audiences receptive and included.  Environmental and sustainable advocates often feel like they alienate others by evangelizing the gloomy urgency for sustainable practices. Portlandia shatters this concern by creating characters who ignore all social boundaries and rationality in their quest for a green city. And though their outlandish actions offend fictional customers and bystanders, they disarm real audiences.

And at its bones, Portlandia still highlights issues like remembering reusable shopping bags and eating locally (which, incidentally, the show also parodies here). Its laughable extremism also reminds us that sustainability should be inclusive, not snobbish or discriminatory.

Tell us your thoughts on the matter: is Portlandia socially-aware or merely comedic?

[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d545PS_AkOw&w=560&h=315]

"There Is No Happiness Without Action"


To celebrate the first ever International Day of Happiness on March 20, declared by the United Nations in 2012, we encourage everyone to do five things that make you happy today, and stop to think about how happiness plays a role in your life.

Though happiness is a term that many throw about carelessly, its place in the sustainability vocabulary holds a potent meaning. We consider it a complex balance of satisfaction with life, physical health, a quality environment, psychological well-being, and community vitality.Happiness is a mix of internal and external factors, and our personal responses to them.

Sustainability focuses on human needs, and theories from Malsow and Max-Neef conclude that the purpose of fulfilling standard human needs is to lead then on the past towards happiness. Even governmental programs are linking happiness with sustainability efforts today. By looking at all needs, big and small, sustainable programs hope to bring a brighter, happier future for everyone.

Happiness is a goal for many, but in today’s hectic lifestyle it can often get shunted to the side. However, there is a growing focus about the individual’s level of happiness, especially on college campuses. Due to the inherently stressful college life, the 200 days a year of gray Seattle skies, and the terrible economy, happiness often seems out of reach.

But just taking the time to focus on your personal happiness has a heap of benefits. Even sitting outside for five minutes of solitary contemplation has been proven to raise satisfaction with life.

Seattle, a participant in the Happiness Initiative, which we discussed in a previous post, has been conducting a lot of research about the city’s local happiness levels, and the factors that are involved. Unfortunately, the results indicate that we live during a particularly stressful time for emerging adults.happyimages
An article in Solutions Journal states that the 2011 Happiness Report Card of Seattle indicated, “youth, ages 19-24, were the least satisfied age group. They scored low in affect, satisfaction with life, time balance, the environment, and marital well-being.” The articles cites economic stressors and lack of community ties as possible contributing factors to the low score.

Although there are no shortcuts to true happiness, there are some easy ways to foster the growth of happiness:
  • Reduce time on electronics like cell phones, laptops, tablets, television, and video games.
  • Exercise, exercise, exercise. Even 15 minutes of walking is enough to boost your mood.
  • Get proper rest. This one can be especially tricky for college students, many of whom grow accustomed to late nights and early mornings, but aiming for 7 hours of shut eye each night can make all the difference.
  • Do something you enjoy! Take some time to read, bike, connect with friends, work on a hobby -- whatever brightens your day.
  • Give to others. Treat a friend, volunteer, give that man with the cardboard sign a dollar. Engage in random acts of kindness.
  • Surround yourself with happy people.
  • Spend time with a pet, either your own or a friend’s.
In recognition of the Day of International Happiness, we recommend taking some time to focus on your personal well-being, and those around you.

happy2imagesIf you are worried about your current state of happiness or satisfaction with life, check out the Student Counseling Center, where a team of trained specialists can help to brainstorm and guide you through possible ways to strengthen these areas.

And please, comment and share what makes you happy!